Peer Community Report – One Lawton Plan (April 2024)
Overview
The Peer Community Report is a benchmarking document created as part of the One Lawton Comprehensive Plan update.
It compares Lawton to similarly sized cities in Oklahoma and North Texas to evaluate:
- population trends
- planning practices
- staffing levels
- policy approaches
These “peer cities” are used to provide context and help guide future planning decisions in Lawton.
Peer Cities Included
- Lawton, Oklahoma
- Midwest City, Oklahoma
- Enid, Oklahoma
- Norman, Oklahoma
- Edmond, Oklahoma
- Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
- Moore, Oklahoma
- Wichita Falls, Texas
Key Takeaways
Population Trends
- Lawton is one of the only peer cities experiencing population decline (2000–2020)
- Most peer cities show strong population growth, especially in central Oklahoma
Planning Updates
- Lawton’s last comprehensive plan update: 2008
- Many peer cities have updated plans more recently:
- Edmond (2022)
- Broken Arrow (2019)
- Moore (2017)
Planning Capacity
- Lawton has approximately 5 planning staff
- Larger peer cities (e.g., Norman) have significantly more personnel dedicated to planning
- Staffing levels may impact implementation capacity
Amendment Processes
-
Lawton allows land use amendment applications
-
Fees include:
- base application fee
- publication costs
- additional per-property notification fees
-
Peer cities vary in:
- whether amendments are allowed
- cost structure
- frequency of updates
Peer Comparison Summary
| City | Population Change (2000–2020) | Last Plan Update | Review Cycle | Planning Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawton | -2,376 | 2008 (updating) | 5 years | ~5 |
| Midwest City | +4,321 | 2008 (updating) | Undefined | ~4 |
| Enid | +4,263 | 2015 | Unknown | ~2 planners |
| Norman | +32,332 | 2004 (updating) | None | ~10 planners |
| Edmond | +26,113 | 2022 | Ongoing | ~5 planners |
| Broken Arrow | +38,681 | 2019 | 10–15 years | ~5 staff |
| Moore | +21,655 | 2017 | ~7 years | ~4 staff |
| Wichita Falls | -1,881 | 2008 | None | ~5 staff |
Strategic Implications
The Peer Community Report suggests:
-
Lawton is lagging behind many peer cities in both growth and plan updates
-
Updating the comprehensive plan is positioned as a necessary step to:
- remain competitive
- support economic development
- guide future land use decisions
-
Differences in staffing and planning structure may impact:
- how policies are implemented
- how quickly updates occur
Why This Matters
Peer reports are often used to:
- justify policy changes
- support zoning and land use decisions
- demonstrate alignment with regional or state trends
Understanding this document helps explain:
- how future decisions may be framed
- what comparisons are being used to support those decisions
Source & Archive
This document is part of the One Lawton Comprehensive Plan materials.
For archived files and verification: → See: One Lawton Plan – Source Archive & File Verification
Notes
This page summarizes key elements of the Peer Community Report for reference and analysis.
Readers are encouraged to review the full document for additional detail and context.